↓ Skip to main content

Current and novel renal biomarkers in heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Failure Reviews, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current and novel renal biomarkers in heart failure
Published in
Heart Failure Reviews, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10741-011-9254-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Damman, Adriaan A. Voors, Gerjan Navis, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, Hans L. Hillege

Abstract

Renal function is the most important predictor of clinical outcome in heart failure (HF). It is therefore essential to have accurate and reliable measurement of renal function and early specific markers of renal impairment in patients with HF. Several renal functional entities exist, including glomerular filtration (GFR), glomerular permeability, tubulointerstitial damage, and endocrine function. Different markers have been studied that can be used to determine changes and the effect of treatment in these entities. In the present review, we summarize current and novel markers that give an assessment of renal function and prognosis in the setting of acute and chronic HF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Other 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,621,823
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Heart Failure Reviews
#427
of 664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,387
of 111,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Failure Reviews
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.