You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Stent graft types for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008447.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Duffy JM, Rolph R, Clough RE, Modarai B, Taylor P, Waltham M |
Abstract |
The UK prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is estimated at 4.9% in over 65-year olds. Progressive and unpredictable enlargement can lead to rupture. Endovascular repair of AAAs involves a stent graft system being introduced via the femoral artery and manipulated within the aorta under radiological guidance. Following endograft deployment, a seal is formed at the proximal and distal landing zones to exclude the aneurysm sac from the circulation. With the increasing popularity of endovascular repair there has been an increase in the number of commercially available stent graft designs on the market. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
Researcher | 8 | 17% |
Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
Other | 10 | 21% |
Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 56% |
Engineering | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2013.
All research outputs
#13,380,993
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,075
of 12,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,860
of 197,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#174
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.