↓ Skip to main content

Investigation on the infection mechanism of the fungus Clonostachys rosea against nematodes using the green fluorescent protein

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigation on the infection mechanism of the fungus Clonostachys rosea against nematodes using the green fluorescent protein
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00253-008-1392-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin Zhang, Jinkui Yang, Qiuhong Niu, Xuna Zhao, Fengping Ye, Lianming Liang, Ke-Qin Zhang

Abstract

The fungus Clonostachys rosea (syn. Gliocladium roseum) is a potential biocontrol agent. It can suppress the sporulation of the plant pathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea and kill pathogenic nematodes, but the process of nematode pathogenesis is poorly understood. To help understand the underlying mechanism, we constructed recombinant strains containing a plasmid with both the enhanced green fluorescent protein gene egfp and the hygromycin resistance gene hph. Expression of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) was monitored using fluorescence microscopy. Our observations reveal that the pathogenesis started from the adherence of conidia to nematode cuticle for germination, followed by the penetration of germ tubes into the nematode body and subsequent death and degradation of the nematodes. These are the first findings on the infection process of the fungal pathogen marked with GFP, and the developed method can become an important tool for studying the molecular mechanisms of nematode infection by C. rosea.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 25%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Engineering 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,756
of 8,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,396
of 96,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#26
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.