↓ Skip to main content

Potential of Protein Phosphatase Inhibitor 1 As Biomarker of Pancreatic β-Cell Injury In Vitro and In Vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential of Protein Phosphatase Inhibitor 1 As Biomarker of Pancreatic β-Cell Injury In Vitro and In Vivo
Published in
Diabetes, July 2013
DOI 10.2337/db12-1507
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Jiang, Benedicte Brackeva, Zhidong Ling, Gertjan Kramer, Johannes M. Aerts, Frans Schuit, Bart Keymeulen, Daniel Pipeleers, Frans Gorus, Geert A. Martens

Abstract

There is a need for plasma-based tests that can directly measure the extent of β-cell injury in vivo in patients receiving islet grafts and in animal models. In this study, we propose protein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 1A (PPP1R1A) as a novel biomarker for acute β-cell destruction. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry proteome analysis of fluorescence-activated cell sorter-purified β-cells, tissue-comparative Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry indicated relatively high molar abundance and selectivity of PPP1R1A in β-cells. PPP1R1A was discharged into the extracellular space of chemically injured rat and human islets in vitro, proportionate to the extent of β-cell death. Streptozotocin injection in rats led to a progressive PPP1R1A depletion from the cytoplasm of disintegrating β-cells and a marked surge in plasma levels detectable by an affinity-capture method. A similar massive PPP1R1A discharge in blood was also detected in three patients immediately after intraportal islet transplantation. Our findings provide first proof-of-principle for PPP1R1A as real-time biomarker of β-cell destruction in animal models and patients and warrant development of more sensitive methods for its further validation in clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 9 30%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 17%
Unspecified 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2013.
All research outputs
#20,187,333
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes
#8,777
of 9,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,836
of 172,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes
#106
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.