↓ Skip to main content

Studying the needed effort for identifying duplicate issues

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Software Engineering, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Studying the needed effort for identifying duplicate issues
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10664-015-9404-6
Authors

Mohamed Sami Rakha, Weiyi Shang, Ahmed E. Hassan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 45%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Researcher 3 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 41 55%
Social Sciences 11 15%
Arts and Humanities 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,351,881
of 22,899,952 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#624
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,220
of 285,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,899,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.