↓ Skip to main content

The director task: A test of Theory-of-Mind use or selective attention?

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The director task: A test of Theory-of-Mind use or selective attention?
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1190-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Rubio-Fernández

Abstract

Over two decades, the director task has increasingly been employed as a test of the use of Theory of Mind in communication, first in psycholinguistics and more recently in social cognition research. A new version of this task was designed to test two independent hypotheses. First, optimal performance in the director task, as established by the standard metrics of interference, is possible by using selective attention alone, and not necessarily Theory of Mind. Second, pragmatic measures of Theory-of-Mind use can reveal that people actively represent the director's mental states, contrary to recent claims that they only use domain-general cognitive processes to perform this task. The results of this study support both hypotheses and provide a new interactive paradigm to reliably test Theory-of-Mind use in referential communication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 27%
Student > Master 17 14%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 42%
Linguistics 10 8%
Neuroscience 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Philosophy 3 2%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 32 26%