You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Discovery and Prevalidation of Salivary Extracellular microRNA Biomarkers Panel for the Noninvasive Detection of Benign and Malignant Parotid Gland Tumors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-3505 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Johannes H. Matse, Janice Yoshizawa, Xiaoyan Wang, David Elashoff, Jan G.M. Bolscher, Enno C.I. Veerman, Elisabeth Bloemena, David T.W. Wong |
Abstract |
This study was conducted to explore the differences in salivary microRNA (miRNA) profiles between patients with malignant or benign parotid gland tumors as a potential preoperative diagnostic tool of tumors in the salivary glands. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Italy | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
Researcher | 9 | 16% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 21% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 27% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 18% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,189,391
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#2,778
of 12,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,505
of 195,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#31
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.