↓ Skip to main content

Olfactory receptors in aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, November 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Olfactory receptors in aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, November 1998
DOI 10.1007/s003590050287
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Freitag, G. Ludwig, I. Andreini, P. Rössler, H. Breer

Abstract

In species representing different levels of vertebrate evolution, olfactory receptor genes have been identified by molecular cloning techniques. Comparing the deduced amino-acid sequences revealed that the olfactory receptor gene family of Rana esculenta resembles that of Xenopus laevis, indicating that amphibians in general may comprise two classes of olfactory receptors. Whereas teleost fish, including the goldfish Carassius auratus, possess only class I receptors, the 'living fossil' Latimeria chalumnae is endowed with both receptor classes; interestingly, most of the class II genes turned out to be pseudogenes. Exploring receptor genes in aquatic mammals led to the discovery of a large array of only class II receptor genes in the dolphin Stenella Coeruleoalba; however, all of these genes were found to be non-functional pseudogenes. These results support the notion that class I receptors may be specialized for detecting water-soluble odorants and class II receptors for recognizing volatile odorants. Comparing the structural features of both receptor classes from various species revealed that they differ mainly in their extracellular loop 3, which may contribute to ligand specificity. Comparing the number and diversity of olfactory receptor genes in different species provides insight into the origin and the evolution of this unique gene family.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Germany 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Chile 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 126 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Professor 9 6%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 15 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,689,692
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#90
of 1,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#851
of 41,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them