↓ Skip to main content

Should we consider Dupuytren's contracture as work-related? A review and meta-analysis of an old debate

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Should we consider Dupuytren's contracture as work-related? A review and meta-analysis of an old debate
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-12-96
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexis Descatha, Pénélope Jauffret, Jean-François Chastang, Yves Roquelaure, Annette Leclerc

Abstract

In view of the conflicting opinions published, a meta-analysis was undertaken on epidemiological studies in order to assess any association between Dupuytren's contracture and work exposure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Other 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 22 26%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,751,467
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,285
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,646
of 110,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#19
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.