Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, November 2016

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 2 blogs

twitter: 15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 27 Mendeley

Summary Blogs X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 18 X posts from 15 X users, with an upper bound of 265,398 followers.

RT @adfillon: Or, connaitre le nom des auteurs augmente par deux les chances d’acceptation du manuscript. https://t.co/yj9FP6uSWx

22 Dec 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

Or, connaitre le nom des auteurs augmente par deux les chances d’acceptation du manuscript. https://t.co/yj9FP6uSWx

22 Dec 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

@messina_jp https://t.co/8uOq2uTQ0Q https://t.co/gFGcZi1Vk2 I think the orchestra study is misleading in this context, because you're playing a fixed piece. In academic work, *what you say* at least partially reveals *who you are.* But then gatekeeping

29 Mar 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @AlfredoMorabia: 10. In a study of double-blinding there was a significant difference in accepted vs. rejected manuscripts if reviewers…

04 Mar 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 14 additional X posts.