↓ Skip to main content

Intramedullary lengthening nails: Can we also correct deformities?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Children's Orthopaedics, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intramedullary lengthening nails: Can we also correct deformities?
Published in
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11832-016-0782-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

U. Lenze, A. H. Krieg

Abstract

Unlike external fixators, the use of solid intramedullary lengthening nails is restricted to defined anatomical preconditions, such as an adequate bone length. Furthermore, all deformity corrections except the lengthening procedure have to be implemented intraoperatively and cannot be adjusted postoperatively. Conversely, even complex deformity corrections can be performed using intramedullary devices after a thorough preoperative planning. For preparation of the intramedullary cavity as well as positioning of the lengthening nail according to the preoperative planning, reaming the medullary canal with rigid reamers which don't follow the line of least resistance is inevitable. However, the application of solid lengthening nails might be limited, especially in children with ongoing epiphyseal growth, although a central perforation of the growth plate was shown to have no adverse effects on the growth potential. In cases with complex or multilevel deformities, an additional osteotomy and locking plate fixation could sometimes be a valuable solution in order to avoid external fixation. The low complication rate as well as the reduced compromising of soft tissues and periosteum render intramedullary lengthening nails the state-of-the-art procedure for limb lengthening in combination with deformity correction in patients who meet the anatomical preconditions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 16%
Researcher 3 12%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 7 28%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 72%
Unknown 7 28%