You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy Does Not Provide Any Additional Value in Agoraphobic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1159/000342715 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K. Meyerbroeker, N. Morina, G.A. Kerkhof, P.M.G. Emmelkamp |
| Abstract |
A number of studies have demonstrated the efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) in specific phobias, but research in seriously impaired patients with agoraphobia is lacking. In this randomized controlled trial with patients with agoraphobia and panic disorder, VRET and exposure in vivo were compared in terms of outcome and processes involved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Portugal | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 230 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 13% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 14% |
| Unknown | 53 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 101 | 42% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 70 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,017,012
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
#509
of 960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,376
of 197,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.