↓ Skip to main content

Gender-specific responses to climate variability in a semi-arid ecosystem in northern Benin

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender-specific responses to climate variability in a semi-arid ecosystem in northern Benin
Published in
Ambio, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0830-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Afiavi P. Dah-gbeto, Grace B. Villamor

Abstract

Highly erratic rainfall patterns in northern Benin complicate the ability of rural farmers to engage in subsistence agriculture. This research explores gender-specific responses to climate variability in the context of agrarian Benin through a household survey (n = 260) and an experimental gaming exercise among a subset of the survey respondents. Although men and women from the sample population are equally aware of climate variability and share similar coping strategies, their specific land-use strategies, preferences, and motivations are distinct. Over the long term, these differences would likely lead to dissimilar coping strategies and vulnerability to the effects of climate change. Examination of gender-specific land-use responses to climate change and anticipatory learning can enhance efforts to improve adaptability and resilience among rural subsistence farmers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 160 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 19%
Student > Master 31 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 19%
Environmental Science 28 17%
Social Sciences 26 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 42 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2021.
All research outputs
#793,962
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#118
of 1,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,000
of 415,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.