You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intermittent pneumatic compression to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients with high risk of bleeding hospitalized in intensive care units: the CIREA1 randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-013-2814-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philippe Vignon, Pierre-François Dequin, Anne Renault, Armelle Mathonnet, Nicolas Paleiron, Audrey Imbert, Delphine Chatellier, Valérie Gissot, Gwenaelle Lhéritier, Victor Aboyans, Gwenael Prat, Denis Garot, Thierry Boulain, Jean-Luc Diehl, Luc Bressollette, Aurélien Delluc, Karine Lacut, The Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Group (CRICS Group) |
| Abstract |
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and serious problem in intensive care units (ICU). Anticoagulant treatments have demonstrated their efficacy in preventing VTE. However, when the bleeding risk is high, they are contraindicated, and mechanical devices are recommended. To date, mechanical prophylaxis has not been rigorously evaluated in any trials in ICU patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,143,925
of 23,878,777 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,634
of 5,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,913
of 288,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,878,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.