You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What Do Patients Think About Year-End Resident Continuity Clinic Handoffs?: A Qualitative Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2395-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amber T. Pincavage, Wei Wei Lee, Kimberly J. Beiting, Vineet M. Arora |
| Abstract |
Although Internal Medicine year-end resident clinic handoffs affect numerous patients, little research has described patients' perspectives of the experience. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 26% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 39% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2013.
All research outputs
#14,546,919
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,379
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,994
of 200,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#51
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.