You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reducing sitting time in office workers: Short-term efficacy of a multicomponent intervention
|
---|---|
Published in |
Preventive Medicine, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.04.004 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Genevieve N. Healy, Elizabeth G. Eakin, Anthony D. LaMontagne, Neville Owen, Elisabeth A.H. Winkler, Glen Wiesner, Lynn Gunning, Maike Neuhaus, Sheleigh Lawler, Brianna S. Fjeldsoe, David W. Dunstan |
Abstract |
To investigate the short-term efficacy of a multicomponent intervention to reduce office workers' sitting time. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 3 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
United States | 2 | 11% |
Canada | 2 | 11% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Norway | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
Scientists | 5 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 454 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Canada | 3 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Austria | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 435 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 108 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 53 | 12% |
Researcher | 41 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 6% |
Other | 66 | 15% |
Unknown | 88 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 15% |
Sports and Recreations | 66 | 15% |
Psychology | 46 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 29 | 6% |
Other | 96 | 21% |
Unknown | 106 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,621,277
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Preventive Medicine
#732
of 5,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,786
of 209,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Preventive Medicine
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.