You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Site‐Occupancy Distribution Modeling to Correct Population‐Trend Estimates Derived from Opportunistic Observations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01479.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
MARC KÉRY, J. ANDREW ROYLE, HANS SCHMID, MICHAEL SCHAUB, BERNARD VOLET, GUIDO HÄFLIGER, NIKLAUS ZBINDEN |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 411 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Spain | 5 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Unknown | 365 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 124 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 88 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 12% |
| Other | 28 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 66 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 233 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 107 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 3% |
| Unknown | 42 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,489,857
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,862
of 3,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,523
of 97,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#38
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.