You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Erratum to: Questions about NgAgo
|
---|---|
Published in |
Protein & Cell, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13238-016-0349-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shawn Burgess, Linzhao Cheng, Feng Gu, Junjiu Huang, Zhiwei Huang, Shuo Lin, Jinsong Li, Wei Li, Wei Qin, Yujie Sun, Zhou Songyang, Wensheng Wei, Qiang Wu, Haoyi Wang, Xiaoqun Wang, Jing-Wei Xiong, Jianzhong Xi, Hui Yang, Bin Zhou, Bo Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 50% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#4,599,559
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Protein & Cell
#180
of 770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,926
of 419,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein & Cell
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.