You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Validation of reported genetic risk factors for periodontitis in a large‐scale replication study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Clinical Periodontology, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1111/jcpe.12092 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Arne S. Schaefer, Gregor Bochenek, Thomas Manke, Michael Nothnagel, Christian Graetz, Anneke Thien, Yvonne Jockel‐Schneider, Inga Harks, Ingmar Staufenbiel, Cisca Wijmenga, Jörg Eberhard, Esra Guzeldemir‐Akcakanat, Naci Cine, Mathias Folwaczny, Barbara Noack, Joerg Meyle, Peter Eickholz, Leonardo Trombelli, Chiara Scapoli, Rahime Nohutcu, Corinna Bruckmann, Christof Doerfer, Søren Jepsen, Bruno G. Loos, Stefan Schreiber |
Abstract |
Many studies investigated the role of genetic variants in periodontitis, but few were established as risk factors. We aimed to validate the associations of recent candidate genes in aggressive periodontitis (AgP). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
Researcher | 10 | 15% |
Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2015.
All research outputs
#15,278,953
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Periodontology
#1,535
of 2,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,926
of 194,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Periodontology
#18
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.