You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
日本産魚類に寄生するウオノエ科等脚類
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer (0008543X), August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.18988/cancer.25.0_113 |
| Authors |
山内 健生 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,446,441
of 25,824,818 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
#1,178
of 14,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,802
of 382,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
#39
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,824,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.