↓ Skip to main content

Functional group contributions to drug-receptor interactions.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, May 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional group contributions to drug-receptor interactions.
Published in
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, May 2002
DOI 10.1021/jm00378a021
Pubmed ID
Authors

P R Andrews, D J Craik, J L Martin

Abstract

The binding constants and structural components of 200 drugs and enzyme inhibitors have been used to calculate the average binding energies of 10 common functional groups. As expected, charged groups bind more strongly than polar groups, which in turn bind more tightly than nonpolar groups. The derived intrinsic binding energies (in kcal/mol) are (i) charged groups, CO-2, 8.2; PO2-4, 10.0; N+, 11.5; (ii) polar groups, N, 1.2; OH, 2.5; CO, 3.4; O or S ethers, 1.1; halogens, 1.3; (iii) nonpolar groups, C (sp2), 0.7; C (sp3), 0.8. These values may be used to determine the goodness of fit of a drug to its receptor. This is done by comparing the observed binding constant to the average binding energy calculated by summing the intrinsic binding energies of the component groups and then subtracting two entropy related terms (14 kcal/mol for the loss of overall rotational and translational entropy and 0.7 kcal/mol for each degree of conformational freedom). Drugs that match their receptors exceptionally well have a measured binding energy that substantially exceeds this calculated average value--examples include diazepam and biotin. Conversely, if the observed binding energy is very much less than the calculated average value, then the drug apparently matches its receptor less well than average. Examples of this type include methotrexate and buprenorphine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 246 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 18%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Other 13 5%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 36 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 114 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Computer Science 12 5%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 42 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,647,188
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#605
of 22,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,868
of 120,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#26
of 7,541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7,541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.