You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consensus guidelines for the use of bowel preparation prior to colonic diagnostic procedures: colonoscopy and small bowel video capsule endoscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Medical Research & Opinion, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1185/03007995.2013.803055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisabeth Mathus-Vliegen, Maria Pellisé, Denis Heresbach, Wolfgang Fischbach, Tricia Dixon, Jonathan Belsey, Fabrizio Parente, Ricardo Rio-Tinto, Alistair Brown, Ervin Toth, Cristiano Crosta, Peter Layer, Owen Epstein, Christian Boustiere |
| Abstract |
Adequate bowel preparation prior to colonic diagnostic procedures is essential to ensure adequate visualisation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 29% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 60% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Current Medical Research & Opinion
#1,137
of 3,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,869
of 209,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Medical Research & Opinion
#18
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.