↓ Skip to main content

The Effects of Playing with Thin Dolls on Body Image and Food Intake in Young Girls

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 2,384)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
16 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
12 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Effects of Playing with Thin Dolls on Body Image and Food Intake in Young Girls
Published in
Sex Roles, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11199-010-9871-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Doeschka J. Anschutz, Rutger C. M. E. Engels

Abstract

This study experimentally tested the effects of playing with thin dolls on body image and food intake in 6- to 10-year-old Dutch girls (N = 117). Girls were randomly assigned to play with a thin doll, an average-sized doll, or Legos in a no doll control condition. After 10 min, they participated in a taste-test and completed questionnaires about body image. No differences were found between conditions for any of the body image variables. However, girls who played with the average-sized doll ate significantly more food than girls in other exposure conditions. Although no support was found for the assumption that playing with thin dolls influences body image, the dolls directly affected actual food intake in these young girls.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 19%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 31%
Social Sciences 18 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 243. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2023.
All research outputs
#153,050
of 25,364,653 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#36
of 2,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#328
of 101,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.