↓ Skip to main content

IgE, Mast Cells, and Eosinophils in Atopic Dermatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
353 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IgE, Mast Cells, and Eosinophils in Atopic Dermatitis
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12016-011-8252-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fu-Tong Liu, Heidi Goodarzi, Huan-Yuan Chen

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with specific immune and inflammatory mechanisms. Atopy is among the major features of the diagnosis criteria for AD but is not an essential feature. Thus, patients diagnosed with AD can be atopic or non-atopic. This review focuses on the role of IgE, mast cells, and eosinophils in the pathogenesis of AD. The known functions of IgE in allergic inflammation suggest that IgE and IgE-mediated mast cell and eosinophil activation contribute to AD, but direct evidence supporting this is scarce. The level of IgE (thus the degree of allergic sensitization) is associated with severity of AD and contributed by abnormality of skin barrier, a key feature of AD. The function of IgE in development of AD is supported by the beneficial effect of anti-IgE therapy in a number of clinical studies. The role of mast cells in AD is suggested by the increase in the mast cell number and mast cell activation in AD lesions and the association between mast cell activation and AD. It is further suggested by their role in mouse models of AD as well as by the effect of therapeutic agents for AD that can affect mast cells. The role of eosinophils in AD is suggested by the presence of eosinophilia in AD patients and eosinophil infiltrates in AD lesions. It is further supported by information that links AD to cytokines and chemokines associated with production, recruitment, and activation of eosinophils.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 238 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Student > Master 25 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 60 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 68 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,778,040
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#98
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,996
of 188,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.