You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does Nutritional Intake Differ Between Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Children with Typical Development?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-008-0606-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison C. Herndon, Carolyn DiGuiseppi, Susan L. Johnson, Jenn Leiferman, Ann Reynolds |
| Abstract |
Consumption of macro- and micronutrients and food group servings by children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs; n = 46) and typical development (n = 31) were compared using 3-day diet records. Children with ASDs consumed significantly more vitamin B6 and E and non-dairy protein servings, less calcium, and fewer dairy servings (p < .05). The significantly lower dairy serving intake persisted after controlling for child age and sex and parental dietary restrictions, and excluding children on the gluten-free casein-free (GFCF) diet. Large proportions of children in both groups did not meet national recommendations for daily intake of fiber, calcium, iron, vitamin E, and vitamin D. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 258 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 14% |
| Researcher | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 19% |
| Unknown | 62 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 11% |
| Psychology | 25 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 70 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2015.
All research outputs
#2,320,275
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,035
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,317
of 83,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.