You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review of forest patch models and their application to global change research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, October 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00224626 |
| Authors |
H.H. Shugart, T.M. Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,925,564
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#2,429
of 5,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,568
of 28,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.