You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Glucocorticoid-induced Changes in Gene Expression of Airway Smooth Muscle in Patients with Asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1164/rccm.201210-1886oc |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ching Yong Yick, Aeilko H. Zwinderman, Peter W. Kunst, Katrien Grünberg, Thais Mauad, Kees Fluiter, Elisabeth H. Bel, René Lutter, Frank Baas, Peter J. Sterk |
| Abstract |
Glucocorticoids are the mainstay of asthma therapy. However, it is unclear whether the benefits of glucocorticoids in asthma are merely based on antiinflammatory properties. Glucocorticoids may also alter gene expression of airway smooth muscle (ASM). We hypothesized that the gene expression profile of the ASM layer in endobronchial biopsies of patients with asthma is altered by oral glucocorticoid therapy as compared with placebo. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 20% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,779,140
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#6,009
of 12,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,232
of 207,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#47
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.