↓ Skip to main content

Comparing the effects of isoflurane and pentobarbital on the responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing the effects of isoflurane and pentobarbital on the responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2253-13-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ju-Wen Cheng, Alison I Weber, Sliman J Bensmaia

Abstract

While pentobarbital has been used extensively in neurophysiological experiments investigating activity in peripheral nerves, it has fallen out of favor as an anesthetic because of safety concerns and is often replaced with isoflurane. However, the effects of isoflurane on the excitability of mechanoreceptive afferents have yet to be conclusively elucidated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 21%
Engineering 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Psychology 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,194,150
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#1,160
of 1,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,682
of 193,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,479 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.