↓ Skip to main content

Could Targeted Exercise Programmes Prevent Lower Limb Injury in Community Australian Football?

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Could Targeted Exercise Programmes Prevent Lower Limb Injury in Community Australian Football?
Published in
Sports Medicine, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40279-013-0056-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine Andrew, Belinda J. Gabbe, Jill Cook, David G. Lloyd, Cyril J. Donnelly, Clare Nash, Caroline F. Finch

Abstract

Australian football is a popular sport in Australia, at both the community and elite levels. It is a high-speed contact sport with a higher incidence of medically treated injuries when compared with most other organized sports. Hamstring injuries, ligament injuries to the knee or ankle, hip/groin injuries and tendinopathies are particularly common and often result in considerable time lost from sport. Consequently, the prevention of lower limb injuries is a priority for both community and elite Australian football organizations. There is considerable literature available on exercise programmes aimed at reducing lower limb injuries in Australian football and other running-related sports. The quality and outcomes of these studies have varied considerably, but indicate that exercise protocols may be an effective means of preventing lower limb injuries. Despite this, there has been limited high-quality and systematic evaluation of these data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 306 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 20%
Student > Bachelor 50 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 10%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Researcher 17 5%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 82 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 25%
Sports and Recreations 73 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 93 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,603,259
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,777
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,135
of 207,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#22
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.