You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors Contributing to Food Waste during Lunchtime in Elementary Schools
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.5264/eiyogakuzashi.69.75 |
Authors |
Keina Abe, Rie Akamatsu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 5 | 25% |
Unknown | 15 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,241,060
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics
#3
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,015
of 192,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them