↓ Skip to main content

Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: Social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
701 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: Social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/bf02874555
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eileen S. Anderson, Richard A. Winett, Janet R. Wojcik

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 701 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 1%
Turkey 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Taiwan 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 679 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 133 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 124 18%
Student > Bachelor 80 11%
Researcher 57 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 55 8%
Other 90 13%
Unknown 162 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 123 18%
Social Sciences 103 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 77 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 67 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 6%
Other 111 16%
Unknown 181 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2013.
All research outputs
#4,555,251
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#451
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,274
of 71,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.