↓ Skip to main content

Best practice in early psychosis intervention for Australian indigenous communities: indigenous worker consultation and service model description

Overview of attention for article published in Australasian Psychiatry, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Best practice in early psychosis intervention for Australian indigenous communities: indigenous worker consultation and service model description
Published in
Australasian Psychiatry, April 2013
DOI 10.1177/1039856213480532
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stanley Catts, Brian O’Toole, Amanda Neil, Meredith Harris, Aaron Frost, Kathy Eadie, Russell Evans, Belinda Crissman, Jennifer McClay, Travis Shorey

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify promising elements of best practice relevant to mainstream mental health service (MHS) delivery of early psychosis intervention (EPI) to Indigenous communities. In a companion paper, a comprehensive literature review identified a promising service model with potential for delivering EPI: an Indigenous sub-team embedded within a mainstream health service.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 28 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,194,150
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Psychiatry
#951
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,942
of 194,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Psychiatry
#16
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.