You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
近畿地方最後のアユモドキの危機と保全
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.18960/seitai.66.3_683 |
Authors |
渡辺 勝敏 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 16 | 33% |
China | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 30 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 45 | 94% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 2 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,271,680
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
#7
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,943
of 418,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.