You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrating multiple data sources in species distribution modeling: a framework for data fusion*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ecy.1710 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krishna Pacifici, Brian J. Reich, David A. W. Miller, Beth Gardner, Glenn Stauffer, Susheela Singh, Alexa McKerrow, Jaime A. Collazo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Portugal | 1 | 11% |
| Denmark | 1 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 346 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 85 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 11% |
| Unknown | 63 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 145 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 85 | 24% |
| Mathematics | 11 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 73 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#3,406
of 7,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,648
of 328,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#47
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.