↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of Age-Dependent Response to Winter Temperature in Perennial Flowering of Arabis alpina

Overview of attention for article published in Science, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms of Age-Dependent Response to Winter Temperature in Perennial Flowering of Arabis alpina
Published in
Science, May 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1234116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Bergonzi, Maria C. Albani, Emiel Ver Loren van Themaat, Karl J. V. Nordström, Renhou Wang, Korbinian Schneeberger, Perry D. Moerland, George Coupland

Abstract

Perennial plants live for more than 1 year and flower only after an extended vegetative phase. We used Arabis alpina, a perennial relative of annual Arabidopsis thaliana, to study how increasing age and exposure to winter cold (vernalization) coordinate to establish competence to flower. We show that the APETALA2 transcription factor, a target of microRNA miR172, prevents flowering before vernalization. Additionally, miR156 levels decline as A. alpina ages, causing increased production of SPL (SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN LIKE) transcription factors and ensuring that flowering occurs in response to cold. The age at which plants respond to vernalization can be altered by manipulating miR156 levels. Although miR156 and miR172 levels are uncoupled in A. alpina, miR156 abundance represents the timer controlling age-dependent flowering responses to cold.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 263 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 24%
Researcher 61 22%
Student > Master 37 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 7%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 28 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 195 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 12%
Environmental Science 3 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 33 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,058,338
of 24,848,516 outputs
Outputs from Science
#18,620
of 80,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,203
of 199,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#230
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,848,516 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.