You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on postdural puncture headache: a consensus report from a multisociety international working group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/rapm-2023-104817 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vishal Uppal, Robin Russell, Rakesh V Sondekoppam, Jessica Ansari, Zafeer Baber, Yian Chen, Kathryn DelPizzo, Dan Sebastian Dirzu, Hari Kalagara, Narayan R Kissoon, Peter G Kranz, Lisa Leffert, Grace Lim, Clara Lobo, Dominique Nuala Lucas, Eleni Moka, Stephen E Rodriguez, Herman Sehmbi, Manuel C Vallejo, Thomas Volk, Samer Narouze |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 207 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 15% |
| India | 15 | 7% |
| Canada | 13 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 6% |
| Mexico | 6 | 3% |
| Spain | 6 | 3% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Turkey | 3 | 1% |
| Singapore | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 81 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 143 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 35 | 17% |
| Scientists | 19 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#307,886
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#22
of 2,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,805
of 359,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.