You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psychophysiological Response Patterns to Affective Film Stimuli
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0062661 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marieke G. N. Bos, Pia Jentgens, Tom Beckers, Merel Kindt |
| Abstract |
Psychophysiological research on emotion utilizes various physiological response measures to index activation of the defense system. Here we tested 1) whether acoustic startle reflex (ASR), skin conductance response (SCR) and heart rate (HR) elicited by highly arousing stimuli specifically reflect a defensive state and 2) the relation between resting heart rate variability (HRV) and affective responding. In a within-subject design, participants viewed film clips with a positive, negative and neutral content. In contrast to SCR and HR, we show that ASR differentiated between negative, neutral and positive states and can therefore be considered as a reliable index of activation of the defense system. Furthermore, resting HRV was associated with affect-modulated characteristics of ASR, but not with SCR or HR. Interestingly, individuals with low-HRV showed less differentiation in ASR between affective states. We discuss the important value of ASR in psychophysiological research on emotion and speculate on HRV as a potential biological marker for demarcating adaptive from maladaptive responding. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 25% |
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 75 | 53% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,580,053
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#43,805
of 196,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,832
of 193,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#954
of 4,942 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,942 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.