↓ Skip to main content

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease as an Etiology of Sleep Disturbance in Subjects with Insomnia and Minimal Reflux Symptoms: A Pilot Study of Prevalence and Response to Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease as an Etiology of Sleep Disturbance in Subjects with Insomnia and Minimal Reflux Symptoms: A Pilot Study of Prevalence and Response to Therapy
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10620-007-0057-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas J. Shaheen, Ryan D. Madanick, Maha Alattar, Douglas R. Morgan, Paris H. Davis, Joseph A. Galanko, Melissa B. Spacek, Bradley V. Vaughn

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a well-recognized cause of impaired sleep in patients with frequent GERD symptoms, as well as those with sleep apnea. GERD's role in sleep disturbance of minimally symptomatic patients with poor sleep quality is less clear. We aimed to define the prevalence of GERD-related sleep disturbance in minimally-symptomatic subjects with demonstrated insomnia, and to assess the changes in sleep efficiency in these subjects after vigorous acid suppression. We recruited subjects aged 18-75 years reporting at least 6 months of insomnia, and sleep difficulty at least three nights per week. Subjects with a BMI > 30, a history of snoring or ongoing use of proton pump inhibitor or H2 receptor antagonist were excluded. Subjects underwent concurrent sleep study with dual channel 24-h pH study. Sleep efficiency, defined as the percentage of time after sleep initiation that the subject actually slept, and spontaneous arousal index, defined as the number of arousals per hour, were calculated. Those with a sleep study demonstrating poor sleep quality (sleep efficiency of < 83%, and > 10 arousals/h for those aged < 45, and > 15 for those who were 45 or older) and no obstructive sleep apnea were treated with rabeprazole 20 mg PO BID x 14 days. After 14 days, the subjects underwent repeat sleep study with pH monitoring. The GERD Symptom Assessment Scale (GSAS), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) were administered to subjects at study inception and after 2 weeks of therapy. Twenty-four subjects reporting insomnia were enrolled, and 20 met criteria for disordered sleep and no OSA. Seventeen completed both the first and second studies, and 16 were adequate for analysis. Baseline GSAS demonstrated trivial or no reflux symptoms in the cohort (no subject scored > 8 out of 45 on GSAS, corresponding to a median rating of reflux symptoms of "not at all"). Four of 16 subjects (25%) demonstrated abnormal pH studies at baseline. All four had normalization of acid exposures on PPI. After 2 weeks of treatment, three of these four subjects had normalization of sleep efficiency, compared to 4 of 12 of the subjects with normal Johnson-DeMeester scores. Repeated measures analysis showed significant improvement in spontaneous arousal index between the first and second study for the whole group (P < 0.0035). Pre- and post-therapy ESS and FOSQ scores were not significantly different. Despite the lack of GERD symptoms, a significant minority of subjects with sleep disturbance have abnormal acid exposures. These preliminary data suggest that aggressive treatment of GERD in such patients may result in improvement in sleep efficiency.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 5%
Belgium 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Other 6 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Psychology 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,494,737
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#445
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,083
of 79,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.