↓ Skip to main content

Clinical picture and outcome of Serious Adverse Events in the treatment of Onchocerciasis

Overview of attention for article published in Filaria Journal, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical picture and outcome of Serious Adverse Events in the treatment of Onchocerciasis
Published in
Filaria Journal, October 2003
DOI 10.1186/1475-2883-2-s1-s6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kwablah Awadzi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Filaria Journal
#12
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,875
of 56,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Filaria Journal
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one scored the same or higher as 18 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.