↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical length measurement and fibronectin testing in women with threatened preterm labor

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical length measurement and fibronectin testing in women with threatened preterm labor
Published in
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, June 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gert-Jan van Baaren, Jolande Y. Vis, William A. Grobman, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Brent C. Opmeer, Ben W. Mol

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of risk stratification with cervical length (CL) measurement and/or fetal fibronectin (fFN) tests in women with threatened preterm labor between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 48 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Researcher 9 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 38%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 8%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 17 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2013.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#12,886
of 13,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,367
of 209,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#66
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.