↓ Skip to main content

Factor Xa Activation of Factor V Is of Paramount Importance in Initiating the Coagulation System

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factor Xa Activation of Factor V Is of Paramount Importance in Initiating the Coagulation System
Published in
Circulation, July 2013
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.113.003191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim J. Schuijt, Kamran Bakhtiari, Sirlei Daffre, Kathleen DePonte, Simone J.H. Wielders, J. Arnoud Marquart, Joppe W. Hovius, Tom van der Poll, Erol Fikrig, Matthew W. Bunce, Rodney M. Camire, Gerry A.F. Nicolaes, Joost C.M. Meijers, Cornelis van ‘t Veer

Abstract

Generation of active procoagulant cofactor factor Va (FVa) and its subsequent association with the enzyme activated factor X (FXa) to form the prothrombinase complex is a pivotal initial event in blood coagulation and has been the subject of investigative effort, speculation, and controversy. The current paradigm assumes that FV activation is initiated by limited proteolysis by traces of (meizo) thrombin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,190,905
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#4,712
of 21,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,252
of 206,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#44
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.