↓ Skip to main content

A market based evaluation of the election versus appointment of regulatory commissioners

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, September 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A market based evaluation of the election versus appointment of regulatory commissioners
Published in
Public Choice, September 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1017938426780
Authors

Joseph a. Fields, Linda S. Klein, James M. Sfiridis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 38%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2002.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#616
of 1,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,309
of 28,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.