↓ Skip to main content

Synergy, redundancy, and multivariate information measures: an experimentalist’s perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computational Neuroscience, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 307)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synergy, redundancy, and multivariate information measures: an experimentalist’s perspective
Published in
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10827-013-0458-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Timme, Wesley Alford, Benjamin Flecker, John M. Beggs

Abstract

Information theory has long been used to quantify interactions between two variables. With the rise of complex systems research, multivariate information measures have been increasingly used to investigate interactions between groups of three or more variables, often with an emphasis on so called synergistic and redundant interactions. While bivariate information measures are commonly agreed upon, the multivariate information measures in use today have been developed by many different groups, and differ in subtle, yet significant ways. Here, we will review these multivariate information measures with special emphasis paid to their relationship to synergy and redundancy, as well as examine the differences between these measures by applying them to several simple model systems. In addition to these systems, we will illustrate the usefulness of the information measures by analyzing neural spiking data from a dissociated culture through early stages of its development. Our aim is that this work will aid other researchers as they seek the best multivariate information measure for their specific research goals and system. Finally, we have made software available online which allows the user to calculate all of the information measures discussed within this paper.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 208 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 28%
Researcher 44 20%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 34 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 36 16%
Computer Science 30 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 11%
Physics and Astronomy 21 9%
Engineering 20 9%
Other 46 21%
Unknown 45 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,395,325
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#37
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,609
of 194,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them