↓ Skip to main content

Neuroprognostication after adult cardiac arrest treated with targeted temperature management: task force for Belgian recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurologica Belgica, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroprognostication after adult cardiac arrest treated with targeted temperature management: task force for Belgian recommendations
Published in
Acta Neurologica Belgica, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13760-017-0755-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Silvio Taccone, Ingrid Baar, Cathy De Deyne, Patrick Druwe, Benjamin Legros, Geert Meyfroidt, Michel Ossemann, Nicolas Gaspard

Abstract

The prognosis of patients who are admitted to the hospital after cardiac arrest often relies on neurological examination, which could be significantly influenced by the use of sedative drugs or the implementation of targeted temperature management. The need for early and accurate prognostication is crucial as up to 15-20% of patients could be considered as having a poor outcome and may undergo withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies while a complete neurological recovery is still possible. As current practice in Belgium is still based on a very early assessment of neurological function in these patients, the Belgian Society of Intensive Care Medicine created a multidisciplinary Task Force to provide an optimal approach for monitoring and refine prognosis of CA survivors. This Task Force underlined the importance to use a multimodal approach using several additional tools (e.g., electrophysiological tests, neuroimaging, biomarkers) and to refer cases with uncertain prognosis to specialized centers to better evaluate the extent of brain injury in these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 17 26%
Unknown 21 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Psychology 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 27 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2018.
All research outputs
#21,699,788
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurologica Belgica
#613
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#364,217
of 427,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurologica Belgica
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.