You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
De-Facto Science Policy in the Making: How Scientists Shape Science Policy and Why it Matters (or, Why STS and STP Scholars Should Socialize)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Minerva, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11024-013-9234-x |
| Authors |
Thaddeus R. Miller, Mark W. Neff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 53% |
| Scientists | 7 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 26% |
| Researcher | 29 | 26% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 53 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2016.
All research outputs
#2,888,971
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Minerva
#76
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,731
of 194,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minerva
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.