↓ Skip to main content

Alterations in cyclin A, B, and D1 in mouse dentate gyrus following TMT-induced hippocampal damage

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotoxicity Research, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alterations in cyclin A, B, and D1 in mouse dentate gyrus following TMT-induced hippocampal damage
Published in
Neurotoxicity Research, January 2003
DOI 10.1007/bf03033154
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher A. McPherson, Julie Kubik, Robert N. Wine, Christian Lefebvre D'Hellencourt, G. Jean Harry

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 8%
Germany 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 23%
Psychology 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2005.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Neurotoxicity Research
#322
of 882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,666
of 129,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotoxicity Research
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.