You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-011-9754-3 |
| Authors |
Elisabeth Krausmann, Elisabetta Renni, Michela Campedel, Valerio Cozzani |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 40 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 52 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,736,890
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#599
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,078
of 108,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.