You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the ecological impacts of invasive species based on their functional responses and abundances
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-017-1378-4 |
| Authors |
Ciaran Laverty, Kyle D. Green, Jaimie T. A. Dick, Daniel Barrios-O’Neill, Paul J. Mensink, Vincent Médoc, Thierry Spataro, Joe M. Caffrey, Frances E. Lucy, Pieter Boets, J. Robert Britton, Josephine Pegg, Cathal Gallagher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| South Africa | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 17% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 36 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 45 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,187
of 2,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,368
of 420,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#34
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.