↓ Skip to main content

Relative Carnitine Deficiency in Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
patent
19 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relative Carnitine Deficiency in Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10803-004-5283-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pauline A. Filipek, Jenifer Juranek, Minh T. Nguyen, Christa Cummings, J. Jay Gargus

Abstract

A random retrospective chart review was conducted to document serum carnitine levels on 100 children with autism. Concurrently drawn serum pyruvate, lactate, ammonia, and alanine levels were also available in many of these children. Values of free and total carnitine (p < 0.001), and pyruvate (p = 0.006) were significantly reduced while ammonia and alanine levels were considerably elevated (p < 0.001) in our autistic subjects. The relative carnitine deficiency in these patients, accompanied by slight elevations in lactate and significant elevations in alanine and ammonia levels, is suggestive of mild mitochondrial dysfunction. It is hypothesized that a mitochondrial defect may be the origin of the carnitine deficiency in these autistic children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 106 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Other 10 9%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Psychology 6 6%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 30 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,355,789
of 25,097,836 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,019
of 5,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,909
of 149,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,097,836 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.