↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of a new dynamic in vitro model of the piglet colon (PigutIVM): application to the study of probiotics

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and validation of a new dynamic in vitro model of the piglet colon (PigutIVM): application to the study of probiotics
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00253-017-8122-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mickaël Alain Fleury, Olivier Le Goff, Sylvain Denis, Frédérique Chaucheyras-Durand, Eric Jouy, Isabelle Kempf, Monique Alric, Stéphanie Blanquet-Diot

Abstract

For ethical, technical, regulatory, and cost reasons, in vitro methods are increasingly used as an alternative to in vivo experimentations. The aim of the present study was to validate, according to in vivo data in living animals, a new in vitro model of the piglet colon, the PigutIVM, under both control conditions and antibiotic disturbance by the widely used colistin. The PigutIVM reproduces the main biotic and abiotic parameters of the piglet colon: temperature, pH, retention time, supply of ileal effluents, complex, and metabolically active microbiota and self-maintained anaerobiosis. Under both control and antibiotic-treated conditions, qPCR analyses showed that the main bacterial populations of piglet gut microbiota were similar in vitro and in vivo, with Pearson correlation coefficient higher than 0.9. During colistin administration, both in piglets and in the in vitro model, a significant decrease in Escherichia coli populations was observed together with changes in microbial composition of subdominant populations. SCFA concentrations were similar in vitro and in vivo and were not modified by colistin. Interestingly, the administration of the probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii CNCM I-1079 led in vitro to a decrease in E. coli levels, as previously observed when the antibiotic treatment was applied. This new in vitro model of the piglet colon provides a flexible, reproducible, and cost-effective tool for the screening of drugs or new dietary compounds, such as pre- or probiotics. It will be helpful for researchers, feed producers, or veterinarians when developing innovative non-antibiotic strategies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,192,096
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,239
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,798
of 429,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#13
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.